The route becomes explicit
UI separates a Product quotation, technical-definition task, supplier decision, execution control or stop decision before any larger scope is proposed.
S01 · Critical Requirement Review
Choose the next defensible move before you commission the work.
A short paid review turns an equipment tag, drawing, failure, supplier quotation or deadline into a written route—before a broad mandate, supplier commitment or avoidable spend.
- Timing
- 3–5 working days
- Commercial basis
- €450–€900 · credited in full toward the commissioned follow-on project
- Engagement model
- Fixed-fee diagnostic
- Begin with
- The asset, quotation or decision in front of you, the evidence already available and the deadline that matters.
- Finish with
- An information-gap register, principal risks, the recommended Product or Service route and a fixed-price proposal for the next step.
The €450–€900 review fee is credited in full toward an approved follow-on project commissioned on the basis of the written recommendation.
What the review changes
One bounded decision before a larger commitment.
Missing evidence is named
Unknown identity, duty, interface, acceptance, owner, timing and commercial assumptions are recorded in a controlled gap register—not left as hidden risk.
The diagnostic is not sold twice
If the recommended follow-on assignment is commissioned, the S01 fee is credited in full toward that project.
Three controlled steps
From mixed evidence to one written route.
The review stays deliberately short: establish the decision, test what the evidence can support, then issue the smallest credible next commitment.
01 · Frame
Name the operating consequence and the decision owner.
UI inventories the asset or commercial event, what is blocked, who must decide, the deadline and the evidence already available in a focused 60–90 minute working session.
Decision-ready outputControlled situation statement, decision boundary, evidence inventory and deadline.
02 · Diagnose
Expose the gaps that can change the route.
Identity, duty, interfaces, supplier scope, documentation, acceptance, compliance, schedule and cost assumptions are tested only to the depth needed for route selection.
Decision-ready outputInformation-gap register and principal technical, commercial and responsibility risks.
03 · Route
Issue the smallest defensible next step.
UI recommends stopping, requesting missing evidence, commissioning the relevant Service, or requesting a Product quotation; scope, timing, and commercial basis are stated in writing.
Decision-ready outputRecommended execution route and written fixed-price proposal for the next step.
Minimum useful evidence
Send what already exists. Do not build a perfect file first.
The public intake captures only the decision context. Sensitive, export-controlled or third-party documents are sent through a private channel after the enquiry receives a reference.
01Asset or decision
What to include+
Equipment tag, part number, drawing or revision, supplier quotation, purchase decision, live order, failure or market objective.
02Available evidence
What to include+
Describe the drawings, nameplates, reports, offers, correspondence or operating facts already held. Do not paste sensitive data into the public form.
03Consequence and deadline
What to include+
State what remains blocked, who owns the decision, the shutdown, award or operating window, and what happens if the decision slips.
Review boundary
S01 selects the route. It does not perform the work itself.
The output is a pre-contract decision file. Engineering approval, supplier approval, regulated conformity decisions and any Product quotation remain separate responsibilities that are expressly assigned.
01
No technical equivalence, supplier capability or availability is presented as verified during the entry review.
02
No design approval, regulated sign-off or purchasing approval is transferred to UI by this review.
03
A Product price or execution fee is issued only after the relevant scope and evidence are sufficient.
04
The client may stop after the written review without commissioning the proposed follow-on.
Start before the scope expands
Route the requirement before committing more spend.
Send the evidence already in front of you. UI will confirm whether S01 is the right entry point and keep the intake focused on the decision that must move.